Annual
Report on Curriculum, Instruction, and
Student
Achievement 2010
Phil
Minkkinen, Superintendent, Patricia Driscoll, Curriculum Coordinator
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
The
·
Ensuring the Curricular Review Cycle is maintained
·
Developing a yearly improvement plan
·
Evaluating the district testing program
·
Completing an annual report to the community
An administrative convener/facilitator
shall facilitate the process. Membership
of the committee shall include the Principals and the Superintendent as well as
one representative from each building, one Special Education Teacher from each
end of the district and the Lead Title I teacher. Parents and community members who would like
to serve are welcome. Citizens interested in volunteering to serve on this
committee should call Patricia Driscoll at 218-834-8221 ext. 8402. The 2009-2010 members include:
Phil Minkkinen,
Superintendent District 381
Patricia
Driscoll, Principal Minnehaha Elementary
Joe Nicklay,
Brett Archer,
Ann Hastings,
Grade 4 Teacher Minnehaha Elementary
Pam Carlson,
Grade K Teacher Minnehaha Elementary
Tom Frericks,
Grade 5 Teacher Wm Kelley Elementary
Dee LeBlanc,
Andrea McMillen,
Grade K Teacher Wm. Kelley El.
Deb Livingston,
Karen Lodin,
No Child Left Behind
MCA-II / GRAD
Test
Graduation-Required Assessments for
Diploma (GRAD) refers to three tests written composition, reading and
mathematics. Students who entered grade
8 in 2005–06 or later must pass these tests in order to graduate from a
Practice assessments are available at this website:
http://etest.pearson.com/customers/Minnesota/mn/itemsampler.htm
More information about the GRAD is available at:
http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/Accountability_Programs/Assessment_and_Testing/Ass
essments/GRAD
The
How did our
students do on the MCA II this past year?
|
|
Percent Math Not Proficient |
Percent Math Proficient |
Percent Reading
Not Proficient |
Percent Proficient |
|
Minnehaha
Elem. |
26.08 |
73.91 |
21.54 |
78.45 |
|
Wm. Kelley
Elem. |
28.99 |
71.0 |
28 |
72 |
|
Two
Harbors High |
47.85 |
52.14 |
31.23 |
68.76 |
|
Wm.
Kelley High |
46.23 |
53.76 |
27.95 |
72.04 |
|
District |
39.26 |
60.73 |
28 |
71.98 |
|
State |
34.10 |
65.89 |
27.65 |
72.34 |
How did our
students do on the MCA II in previous years?
|
|
Percent Not Proficient Math |
Percent Proficient Math |
Percent Not Proficient |
Percent Proficient |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
District |
47.17 |
52.82 |
27.76 |
72.23 |
|
State |
41.95 |
58.04 |
28.48 |
71.51 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
District |
43.07 |
56.92 |
30.58 |
69.41 |
|
State |
39.37 |
60.62 |
31.77 |
68.22 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
District |
43.21 |
56.78 |
26.89 |
73.10 |
|
State |
37.96 |
62.03 |
29.30 |
70.69 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
District |
39.61 |
60.38 |
26.35 |
73.64 |
|
State |
36.14 |
63.85 |
28.08 |
71.91 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
District |
39.26 |
60.73 |
28.01 |
71.98 |
|
State |
34.10 |
65.89 |
27.65 |
72.34 |
NOTE:
Additional
information regarding tests and data for individual schools and State Report
Cards can be found at the Minnesota Department of Education websites:
http://education.state.mn.us/ReportCard2005/index.do http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/Accountability_Programs/Assessment_and_Testing/index.html
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The District Administrative
Team attended a two day data retreat in August and met again in September with
the District Improvement Plan Team. The
teams studied the district test results carefully and created a District
Improvement Plan including goals and actions for improvement in teaching and
learning. Their suggestions are based on
trends and patterns they identified in the district MCA II data.
1. Implement Professional Learning
Communities for all certified staff.
Design and implement action research district-wide to improve
assessment, enhance professional development, and develop instructional
strategies.
2. Use formative assessments, such as
CBM, Accelerated Reader, Scholastic Reading, Lexia Learning, and others to
measure progress toward achieving the standards.
3. Research what is evidence based
reading intervention curriculum with emphasis in special education.
4. Continue the process of implementing
Response to Intervention district-wide in grades PreK-12 in reading by focusing
in on a student’s skills and needs and differentiating instruction to meet the
student’s needs.
STAFF
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The District Staff
Development Team met in September to review the 2009-10 Staff Development Plan. It was decided to continue the same goals for
2010-2011 which are improving reading teaching and learning, math teaching and
learning and technology use in the classroom.
The District’s major focus for 2010-2011
is reading. Professional Learning
Communities will be implemented District-wide.
Every teacher and administrator will participate in at least one ongoing
PLC throughout the school year. Speakers
on Brain Development and teaching strategies will be brought to the district to
train teachers and administrators district-wide. Some teachers and administrators may attend workshops/conferences
that pertain to the District Goals and their PLC study groups to gain
information to bring back and share.
Special
Education teachers will learn to analyze and use the results of formative and
summative assessments and incorporate the results of data
to monitor and adjust instruction. Special Education teachers will also evaluate
the skills and concepts of the
CURRICULUM REVIEW CYCLE
|
YEAR |
PREVIEW |
REVIEW |
IMPLEMENT |
|
2010-11 |
SCIENCE |
Language Arts |
Math |
|
2011-12 |
MUSIC ART |
SCIENCE |
Language Arts |
|
2012-13 |
SOCIAL STUDIES WORLD LANG. |
Music, Art TECHNOLOGY |
SCIENCE |
|
2013-14 |
PRACTICAL ARTS |
SOCIAL STUDIES WORLD LANG. |
Music Art |
|
2014-15 |
HEALTH & P.E. |
PRACTICAL ARTS |
SOCIAL STUDIES WORLD LANG. |
|
2015-16 |
Math |
HEALTH & P.E. |
Practical Arts |
|
2016-17 |
Language Arts |
Math |
HEALTH & P.E. |
Preview individuals will gather information regarding curriculum and instruction
that are in line with Best Practices and assist in implementation of the
Standards.
Review Materials are reviewed and
selections are made that meet the needs of the students, align with the
standards and are supported by Best Practices research.
Implement The School Board sets aside funds every year to purchase the necessary
curriculum.